Back to selected work

Verification-First Hardware Design

ETCH

Verification-first hardware design from intent to evidence.

Role
Founder & Engineer
Year
2026
Status
Public repository · local vertical slice

A proven

50-cycle sim

BMC depth 32

Yosys 0.66

Physical signoff pending

Problem

AI can generate RTL, but generation alone does not prove a chip design should be trusted. Hardware workflows need durable evidence: what passed, what failed, which tools were missing, and which claims are still out of bounds.

System

FIFO to arbiter to AXI-lite to DMA to cache to RV32I to accelerator to SoC ladder with verification gates.

Evidence

Saved FIFO run dossier, Yosys 0.66 synth metrics, sim and bounded-formal pass records, and verification-gate sequence as the architecture story.

Outcome

The saved vertical slice carries a synchronous FIFO through typed specs, three candidates, independent oracle artifacts, simulation and bounded-formal gates, Yosys 0.66 metrics, explicit missing-tool states, and Markdown/JSON proof dossiers. Physical signoff remains pending.

System

Verification-first hardware path

Natural-language intent becomes typed specs, ranked candidates, and a proof dossier with explicit missing-tool states.

IntentNL reqTyped specCandidates×3 FIFOEDA gatessim/formalProof dossierMD/JSON

Approach

I built a FastAPI backend, React/Vite workbench, Electron shell, file-backed run workspace, deterministic FIFO demo, optional LLM proposal path, simulation/formal/synthesis adapters, claims ledger, and status-aware cockpit views for trust and diagnostics.

Constraints

Hardware proof is staged; claims track the verified ladder, not aspirational silicon.